historynerd1985 ([info]historynerd1985) wrote,
  • Mood: The workday's over soon!!

Psycho schoolboys

A Separate Peace by John Knowles

Technically, only Leper, after going into the army, was psycho. But i think all the boys in this novel were. I mean,do real people act like that? I hope not,or the world would be a scarier place than it already is.
On the one hand, it may not be their fault. If I was a senior in 1943,and knew that as soon as i graduated i'd have to go fight,I may be psycho too. But HONESTLY,some of the things they did were just unexplainable. Or weren't explained very well, anyway. The biggest example is when Gene made Phineas fall out of the tree. You know he's feeling jealous,but then all of the sudden he does that,and it's not even apparant that it's deliberate,b/c he was always afraid of falling so it wasn't abnormal that his legs bent out of fear. And why did Brinker feel like he had to have his own little trial? Gene and Phinea's relationship could use some SERIOUS explaining,b/c it seemed to me like they were homosexual lovers. Everything they did had to be passed by the other,and they were practically attached at the hip. It was just WEIRD. And Leper. Did he go crazy BEFORE he went into the army,or after/because of it? And Brinker. Why did he suddenly give up everything he cared about,like all the presidencies and stuff? And does ANYONE at that school ever go to class or study? Because it seemed to me like all they did was skip,but maybe that is because there wasn't a description of the times when they actually went to class. Why did everyone,including the teachers,do whatever Phineas said? Why was Gene at the Devon school to start with? Did no one go to college,or were they planning on it when the war was over? And why the heck did Phineas die? I mean,is that whole bone marrow thing even POSSIBLE? What did Gene do after the war,and why is he back at Devon in the beginning? Did he end up admitting he was gay later (because I swear he is),in the 60s/70s? What happened to everyone else?
I know this book is supposed to be a "classic",but I didn't like it at all. There were too many questions left unanswered. Too much weirdness. It was like Catcher in the Rye, a "classic" book about a boy who should be in an insane asylum. Why do we make such depressing novels "classic" and force students to read them? No wonder our generation is on so many meds...

I give this book a 4,but only because Gene is such a spectacularly weird, messed-up character,and i have to give Knowles some kudos for that.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 5 comments

[info]toothfairy3220

August 3 2005, 00:48:15 UTC 6 years ago

It's better than that! The unanswered questions and Gene's potentially psycho-ness are what MAKE the book! That's why it's so good because he's so fascinatingly screwed! Really!

(Of course, I haven't read it in 3 1/2 years, but at least that's how I felt about it then.)

[info]historynerd1985

August 3 2005, 01:43:56 UTC 6 years ago

i don't like books that leave things unanswered...that's why i liked Mrs. Dalloway so much,b/c it TOLD you what everyone was thinking,since it was written in stream-of-conciousness. Of course,YOU didn't like Farewell to Arms and I loved it. So I guess we differ in some things....

[info]toothfairy3220

August 3 2005, 04:15:52 UTC 6 years ago

Oh, I think part of master storytelling is giving just enough info to imply something but not fully answering the question. Either making people infer that or leaving a mystery that they can only speculate about. As far as psych stuff goes, so much of that is a mystery that I find it totally appropriate to leave it unexplained. Maybe the author doesn't know what was up with Gene either. I don't think I'd like to have a character like Gene all figured out even if I were writing about him.

[info]historynerd1985

August 3 2005, 14:53:01 UTC 6 years ago

if i was a writer,i'd have to know my characters completely,and what they would do in every situation,their past,their future,etc. But that is me,b/c i am a planner. I'm practically a walking calendar. So planning my character's lives would be fun for me,even if i didn't include it in the book.

[info]toothfairy3220

August 3 2005, 21:38:24 UTC 6 years ago

Well, I would be able to say, "That's so like them" or "that's not" but I might not entirely know things that the characters themselves wouldn't be sure of.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…